Evolutionary, Natural Protections of the Human Species Against Inbreeding and Inbreeding Depression

1 Alergenne A., Faurie C., Raymond M. Are parents’ perceptions of offspring facial resemblance consistent with actual resemblance? Effects on parental investment. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2010; 31, 7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.09.002 Search in Google Scholar

2 Alvergne A., Faurie C., Raymond M. Father–offspring resemblance predicts paternal investment in humans. Anim. Behav. 2009; 78, 61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.03.019 Search in Google Scholar

3 Antfolk J, Karlsson M, Bäckström A i wsp. Disgust elicited by third-party incest: the roles of biological relatedness, co-residence, and family relationship. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2012; 33(3): 217–223. doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.09.005 Search in Google Scholar

4 Antfolk J, Lieberman D, Santtila P. Fitness costs predict inbreeding aversion irrespective of self-involvement: support for hypotheses derived from evolutionary theory. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50613. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050613 Search in Google Scholar

5 Aoki K. Avoidance and prohibition of brother–sister sex in humans. Population Ecology 2004; 47(1): 13–19 Search in Google Scholar

6 Aoki K., Ihara Y., Feldman M.W. Conditions for the spread of culturally transmitted costly punishment of sib mating. W: M. J. Brown (Ed.), Explaining culture scientifically, str. 100-116. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2008 Search in Google Scholar

7 Apicella C.L., Marlowe, F.W. Perceived mate fidelity and paternal resemblance predict men’s investment in children. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2004; 25, 371–378. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.06.003 Search in Google Scholar

8 Becker April M. The flight of the locus of selection: Some intricate relationships between evolutionary elements, Behavioural Processes 2019; 161: 31–44. doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.01.002 Search in Google Scholar

9 Beecher M.D. Kin recognition in birds. Behavior Genetics 1988; 18, 465–482. doi:10.1007/BF01065515 Search in Google Scholar

10 Billingsley J., Antfolk J., Santtila P. i wsp. Cues to paternity: do partner fidelity and offspring resemblance predict daughter-directed sexual aversions? Evol. Hum. Behav. 2018; 39, 290–299. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.02.001 Search in Google Scholar

11 Bittles AH, Neel JV. The costs of human inbreeding and their implications for variations at the DNA level. Nature Genetics 1994; 8: 117–121 Search in Google Scholar

12 Bressan P., Bertamini M., Nalli A. i wsp. Men do not have a stronger preference than women for self-resemblant child faces. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2009; 38, 657–664. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9350-0 Search in Google Scholar

13 Bushnell O.A. The Gifts of Civilization: Germs and Genocide in Hawai’i. Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press, 1993 Search in Google Scholar

14 Buss D. Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind, wyd. 4. London: Psychology Press. 2014 Search in Google Scholar

15 Buss D.M., Larsen R.J., Westen D. i wsp. Sex differences in jealousy: evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychol. Sci. 1992; 3, 251–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00038.x. Search in Google Scholar

16 Carando J. Hawaiian Royal Incest. Transatlantica: Revue d’Études Américaines. 2021. doi. org/10.4000/transatlantica.525 Search in Google Scholar

17 Cassedy J.H., Bushnell O.A.. The Gifts of Civilization: Germs and Genocide in Hawai’i Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. The American Historical Review 1995, 100: 5: 1676–1677, doi. org/10.1086/ahr/100.5.1676. Search in Google Scholar

18 Charlesworth D., Willis J.H. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Reviews Genetics 2009; 10, 783–796. doi:10.1038/nrg2664 Search in Google Scholar

19 Cooper, John M. Incest Prohibitions in Primitive Culture. Primitive Man, 1932; 5, 1:1–20 Search in Google Scholar

20 Darwin C., Bynum W.F. The origin of species by means of natural selection: or, the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life (p. 458). New York: AL Burt. 2009 Search in Google Scholar

21 DarwinC.R.On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray. 1859 Search in Google Scholar

22 DeBruine L.M. Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: Context-specific effects of facial resemblance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 2005; 272, 919–922. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.3003 Search in Google Scholar

23 DeMause, L. The universality of incest. The Journal of Psychohistory 1991; 19(2), 1-20 Search in Google Scholar

24 Durand V.M., Barlow, D.H. Essentials of Abnormal Psychology, 6th Edn. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. 2012 Search in Google Scholar

25 Eggins B.R. Chemical Sensors and Biosensors. John Wiley & Sons. 2002 Search in Google Scholar

26 El Guindi F., Read D. Westermarck hypothesis reconsidered: A comment onKushnick and Fessler. Current Anthropology, 2012; 53 (1): 134-135 Search in Google Scholar

27 Ene C., Burtăverde V., Jonason P. i wsp. Fathers high in psychopathy invest more in offspring who resemble them. Personality and Individual Differences 159 (2020): 109879 Search in Google Scholar

28 Fergusson D.M., McLeod G.F., Horwood L.J. Childhood sexual abuse and adult developmental outcomes: Findings from a 30-year longitudinal study in New Zealand. Child Abuse & Neglect 2013; 37: 664–674. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu. 2013.03.013 Search in Google Scholar

29 Fessler DMT, Navarrete CD. Third-party attitudes toward sibling incest Evidence for Westermarck’ s hypotheses. Evolution and Human Behavior 2004; 25: 277–294 Search in Google Scholar

30 Fox R. Sibling incest. British Journal of Sociology 1962; 13 (2):28-150 Search in Google Scholar

31 Gaulin S.J.C., Schlegel A. Paternal confidence and paternal investment – a cross-cultural test of a sociobiological hypothesis. Ethol. Sociobiol. 1980; 1: 301–309. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(80)90015-1 Search in Google Scholar

32 Grammer K.F., Bernhard N.N. Human pheromones and sexual attraction. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2005; 118 (2): 135–142. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.08.010 Search in Google Scholar

33 Haig D. Asymetric Relations: Internal Conflicts and the Horror of Incest. Evolution and Human Behavior 1999; 20: 83–98 Search in Google Scholar

34 Hamilton WD. The genitical evolution of social behaviour. I. J Theor Biol. 1964; 7(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 Search in Google Scholar

35 Havlicek J, Roberts SC, Flegr J. Women’s preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biol Lett. 2005;1(3):256-9. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0332 Search in Google Scholar

36 Heijkoop M., Semon Dubas J., van Aken M.A. Parent–child resemblance and kin investment: physical resemblance or personality similarity? Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 2009; 6, 64–69. doi: 10.1080/17405620802642306 Search in Google Scholar

37 Herz R.S., Inzlicht M. Sex differences in response to physical and social factors involved in human mate selection. Evol. Hum. Behav.2002; 23 (5): 359–364. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00095-8 Search in Google Scholar

38 Heth G., Todrank J., Johnston R.E. Similarity in the qualities of individual odors among kin and species in Turkish (Mesocricetus brandti) and golden (Mesocricetus auratus) hamsters. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1999; 113, 321–326 Search in Google Scholar

39 Kenrick D.T., Griskevicius V., Neuberg S.L. i wsp. Renovating the pyramid of needs contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2010; 5, 292–314. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369469 Search in Google Scholar

40 Koh K.B., Lee, B.K. Reduced lymphocyte proliferation and interleukin-2 production in anxiety disorders. Psychosom. Med. 1998; 60, 479–483. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199807000-00015 Search in Google Scholar

41 Kresanov P, Kotler J, Seto M. i wsp. Intergenerational incest aversion: self-reported sexual arousal and disgust to hypothetical sexual contact with family members. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2018;39(6):664-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.06.008 Search in Google Scholar

42 Kring A.M., Johnson S., Davison, G.C. i wsp. Abnormal Psychology, wyd. 12. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 2013 Search in Google Scholar

43 Kumar s. Pai RA. Swaminathan MS. Consanguincous marriages and the genetic load due to Iethal genes in Kerala. Ann Humn Genet 1967; 31:141-5. Search in Google Scholar

44 Lieberman D., Tooby J., Cosmides L. The architecture of human kin detection. Nature 2007; 445, 727–731. doi:10.1038/nature05510 Search in Google Scholar

45 Lumsden C.J., Wilson E.O. Gene-culture translation in the avoidance of sibling incest. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1980; 77(10), 6248-6250 Search in Google Scholar

46 Mace D. i V. Marriage: East and West. Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Co., 1959 Search in Google Scholar

47 Mahmut MK, Croy I. The role of body odors and olfactory ability in the initiation, maintenance and breakdown of romantic relationships – A review, Physiology & Behavior, 2019; 207:179-184 Search in Google Scholar

48 Marshall J. AR. What is inclusive fitness theory, and what is it for?, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 2016; 12: 103–108. doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.09.015 Search in Google Scholar

49 Masters R.E.L., Patterns of Incest A Psycho-social Study of Incest, Based on Clinical and Historic Data. New York: Ace Books. 1970 Search in Google Scholar

50 May R. When to be incestuous. Nature 1979; 279: 192–194 Search in Google Scholar

51 McCabe J. FBD marriage: Further support for the Westermarck hypothesis. American Anthropologist 1983; 85, 50-69 Search in Google Scholar

52 McGee W.J., ‘The Beginning of Marriage. American Anthropologist, 1899, 1, 4: 646-674. doi. org/10.1525/aa.1899.1.4.02a00040 Search in Google Scholar

53 Morgan L., Tooker E. The Structure of the Iroquois League: Lewis H. Morgan’s Research and Observations. Ethnohistory, 1983; 30(3), 141-154. doi:10.2307/481022 Search in Google Scholar

54 Nak-Eon Choi; Jung H. Han. How Flavor Works: The Science of Taste and Aroma. John Wiley & Sons. 2015 Search in Google Scholar

55 Noble M., Mason J.K. Incest. Journal of medical ethics, 1978; 4(2): 64-70. doi: 10.1136/jme.4.2.64 Search in Google Scholar

56 Obeyesekere G., The Cult of the Goddess Pattini. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984 Search in Google Scholar

57 Palau-Marti M.. Cazeneuve J.. Sociologie du rite (tabou, magie, sacré). In: Revue de l’histoire des religions, 1971; 184, 1,. s. 110 Search in Google Scholar

58 Prokop P., Fančovičová J. Mothers are less disgust sensitive than childless females, Personality and Individual Differences, Personality and Individual Differences 2016; 96(3):65-69. doi:10.1016/j. paid.2016.02.064 Search in Google Scholar

59 Prokosch M.L., Airington Z., Murray D.R.. Investigating the relationship between olfactory acuity, disgust, and mating strategies, Evolution and Human Behavior, 2021; 42, 2:113-120 Search in Google Scholar

60 Radha Rama Devi A, Rao NA, Bittles AH. Inbreeding in the state of Karnataka, South India. Hum Hered. 1982; 32(1):8-10. doi: 10.1159/000153252 Search in Google Scholar

61 Rampal S.N., Indian Women and Sex. New Delhi: Printoy, 1978, str. 69-71 Search in Google Scholar

62 Rantala M.J., Marcinkowska U.M. The role of sexual imprinting and the Westermarck Effect in mate choice in humans. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2011; 65,859-873 Search in Google Scholar

63 Rao P.S.S. Inharaj S.G. Inbreeding in Tamil Nadu. South India. Soc Biol 1977:24:281-8 Search in Google Scholar

64 Read D.W. Incest taboos and kinship: a biological or a cultural story? Reviews in Anthropology, 2014; 43(2), 150-175. doi: 10.1080/00938157.2014.903151 Search in Google Scholar

65 Roberts, R., O’Connor, T., Dunn, J. i wsp. The effects of child sexual abuse in later family life: Mental health, parenting and adjustment of offspring. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2004; 28, 525–545. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.07.006 Search in Google Scholar

66 Robertson A.F. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Roberts, R., O’Connor, T., Dunn, J. i wsp. The effects of child sexual abuse in later family life: Mental health, parenting and adjustment of offspring. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2004; 28, 525–545. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.07.006Behavioral Sciences, 2001 Search in Google Scholar

67 Sanghvi LD. Inbreeding in rural areas of Andhra Priadesh. Inidiaui J GeCeet 1966; 26A: 351-65 Search in Google Scholar

68 Seemanovà E. A study of children of incestuous matings. Prague Human Heredity, 1971; 21, 1085–1128. doi:10.1159/000152391 Search in Google Scholar

69 Shackelford T.K., Buss D.M., Bennett K. Forgiveness or breakup: sex differences in responses to a partner’s infidelity. Cogn. Emotion 2002; 16, 299–307. doi: 10.1080/02699930143000202. Search in Google Scholar

70 Shepher J. Mate selection among second-generation kibbutz adolescents and adults:Incest avoidance and negative imprinting. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1971; 1, 293-307 Search in Google Scholar

71 Spehr M., Kelliher K.R., Li X.H. i wsp. Essential role of the main olfactory system in social recognition of major histocompatibility complex peptide ligands. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(7): 1961-70. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4939-05.2006 Search in Google Scholar

72 Stevenson R. The Psychology of Flavour, Oxford, 2009; online ed, Oxford Academic, 2010 Search in Google Scholar

73 Stoltenborgh M., Bakermans-Kranenburg M.J., van IJzendoorn M.H. i wsp. Cultural–geographical differences in the occurrence of child physical abuse? A meta-analysis of global prevalence. International Journal of Psychology, 2013; 48:81–94. doi:10.1080/00207594.2012.697165 Search in Google Scholar

74 Stoltenborgh, M., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Euser, E. M. i wsp. A global perspective on child sexual abuse: Meta-analysis of prevalence around the world. Child Maltreatment, 2011; 16, 79–101. doi:10.1177/1077559511403920 Search in Google Scholar

75 Stroebel S.S., O’Keefe S.L., Beard K i wsp.–daughter incest: Data from an anonymous computerized survey. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2012; 21, 176–199. doi:10.1080/10538712.2012.654007 Search in Google Scholar

76 Stubbs B., Koyanagi A., Hallgren M. i wsp. Physical activity and anxiety: a perspective from the World Health Survey. J. Affect. Disord. 2017; 208, 545–552. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.10.028 Search in Google Scholar

77 Thomas W.I. The Relation of Sex to Primitive Social Control, American Journal of Sociology 1898; 3: 754-76 Search in Google Scholar

78 Tidefors I., Arvidsson H., Ingevaldson s. i wsp. Sibling incest: a literature review and a clinical study. Journal of Sexual Aggression: An international, interdisciplinary forum for research, theory and practice, 2010; 16(3), 347-360. doi: 10.1080/13552600903511667 Search in Google Scholar

79 Tooby J. Pathogens, polymorphism, and the evolution of sex. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1982; 97: 557–576 Search in Google Scholar

80 Trivers R. Parental investment and sexual selection. Natural Selection and Social Theory: Selected Papers of Robert Trivers. New York: International University Press. 1972 Search in Google Scholar

81 Tybur J.M., Inbar Y., Güler E., Molho C. Is the relationship between pathogen avoidance and ideological conservatism explained by sexual strategies?,Evolution and Human Behavior, 2015; 36,6: 489-497. doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.01.006 Search in Google Scholar

82 Vincent G.E. “The Development of Sociology.” W:Howard J. Rogers (ed) Congress of Arts and Sciences, Universal Exposition, St. Louis, 5: 800, 1904 Search in Google Scholar

83 Volk A., Quinsey V.L. Parental investment and resemblance: Replications, refinements, and revisions. Evolutionary Psychology, 2007; 5, 1–14. doi:10.1177/v147470490700500101 Search in Google Scholar

84 Walter A. From Westermarck’s Effect to Fox’s Law: paradox and principle in the relationship between incest taboos and exogamy. Social Science Information. 2000;39(3):467-488. doi:10.1177/053901800039003007 Search in Google Scholar

85 Westermarck E. The history of human marriage, wyd 5. .London: Macmillan. 1922 Search in Google Scholar

86 Westermarck E. The History of Human Marriage. wyd. 1. New York, Macmillan. 1891; 18, 444: 80. doi: 10.1126/science.ns-18.444.80-b Search in Google Scholar

87 Wolf A., Durham W.L. Inbreeding, incest, and the Incest taboo: the state of knowledge at the turn of the century. California, CA: Stanford University Press. 2004 Search in Google Scholar

88 Wolf, A.P. Incest avoidance and the incest taboos: Two aspects of human nature. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 2014 Search in Google Scholar

89 Wolf, A.P. Sexual attraction and childhood association: A Chinese brief for Edward Westermarck. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 1995 Search in Google Scholar

90 Wolf, A.P. Westermarck redivius. Annual Review of Anthropology, 1993; 22,157-175 Search in Google Scholar

91 Yu Q., Guo Y., Zhang L. i wsp. More Similar,the Healthier: The Effect of Perceived Parent-Child Facial Resemblance on Parental Physical Health.Front. Psychol. 2019; 9:2739.doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02739 Search in Google Scholar

92 Yu Q., Zhang Q., Chen J. i wsp. The effect of perceived parent–child facial resemblance on parents’ trait anxiety: the moderating effect of parents’ gender. Front. Psychol. 2016; 7:658. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00658 Search in Google Scholar

93 Yu Q., Zhang Q., Jin s. i wsp. The effect of perceived facial resemblance on parent-child relationship. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2017; 116, 359–365. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.016 Search in Google Scholar