1. bookVolume 22 (2022): Issue 2 (June 2022)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
19 Oct 2012
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Image Analysis as a Method of the Assessment of Yarn for Making Flat Textile Fabrics

Published Online: 11 Jul 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 22 (2022) - Issue 2 (June 2022)
Page range: 201 - 207
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
19 Oct 2012
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Introduction

Currently, customers apart from price more often focus their attention on the quality of textile fabrics. An appropriate ratio of price to quality is one of the basic conditions that must be fulfilled by the fabric to be bought by the consumer. Producers must provide a high output of their production and permanently control its course and qualitative parameters of fabric to obtain a high quality product with an adequate price. To maintain such a state of matter, spinning mills permanently modernize their machines and use their own laboratories to permanently control the successive intermediate products in the spinning process.

The quality of the yarns manufactured is best characterized by the distribution irregularity of yarn linear density that also exerts a considerable influence on parameters such as elongation at break, breaking force, degree of twist, and their coefficients of variation [1, 2].

Modern apparatuses used for yarn testing make it possible to create digital images of the predicted appearance of woven and knitted fabrics made of the yarn tested, which provides a possibility of a quick verification and makes it possible to undertake an appropriate action already in the phase of yarn production. To reliably perform the assessment, the images should be subjected to computer-aided analysis allowing one to eliminate subjective conclusions.

Irregularity of the yarn linear density

The fibers that are locked together due to imparting a proper twist to them or sizing form a cylindrical body known as yarn in the final stage of spinning. To be suitable without reservations for further processing into flat fabrics, the yarn has to possess appropriately selected qualitative parameters, which makes it possible to obtain it from woven of knitted fabrics with the best possible functional properties. The yarn quality depends on the properly selected fibers, technological process, and the parameters of machine operation in every spinning stage. The yarn quality is assessed by means of determining appropriate quality parameters, among which the most important one is the variation coefficient of linear density CV% on sections with different lengths. Other quality parameters may have higher or lower significance depending on the yarn application [3,4,5].

From the technological point of view, the irregularity of linear density is one of the most important parameters to assess both the final product and the spinning process itself. Depending on the fiber type used to make a yarn, the irregularity of the linear density of the fiber stream can be caused by the fiber thickness variability—in the case when the continuous filaments are used—or by using different number of staple fibers and their different linear densities.

In spinning industry, many sources of the yarn linear irregularity are defined. They are classified as structural irregularities resulting from the irregularity of the fiber quality parameters and as structural irregularities of the products in successive production stages and faults in the operation of particular machines.

The yarn linear density irregularity influences the physical properties of yarn and its breakage capability during spinning, and when it periodically occurs it can contribute to the occurrence of unwanted patterns in fabrics that deteriorate their quality.

So far, many methods of the irregularity assessment of the fiber stream linear density have been developed. Among them one can distinguish a method of irregularity gradient, a method of mobile average, and a correlational or spectral analysis. On account of a wide application, low labor intensity, and time consumption needed for performing the tests, the spectral analysis, also named harmonic analysis, is commonly used.

Spectral analysis of yarns

The spectral (harmonic) analysis allows one to test the irregularity of the yarn linear density and to detect the phenomenon of a hidden periodicity in the structure of spinning products. It also makes it possible to obtain detailed information about the structure of fiber stream through the decomposition of its thickness into harmonic components. The harmonic analysis has found a particular use in the spinning industry as a method of controlling production processes, making it possible to detect and localize errors and faults that appear during the yarn production.

In practice, using a special apparatus such as Uster Tester 5 (UT5), the spectrograms of the fiber stream thickness are drawn up, from which one can read up the values of harmonic components of amplitudes. The analysis of these spectrograms makes it possible to know the source of possible errors.

Technological faults reveal their presence in a spectrogram in the form of the so-called bumps consisting of clinging stripes with increased amplitude. Mechanical faults are revealed in the spectrogram of the yarn tested in the form of intensified stripes, also called peaks or chimneys. Depending on whether the periodical error is sinusoidal or non-sinusoidal, the intensified chimneys will occur at different intervals. For the sinusoidal errors, it will be one or two chimneys occurring directly one after the other. If a periodical error causes a non-sinusoidal mass distribution, the spectrogram will show a series of intensified peaks remote from each other.

Apparatus UT5, apart from the determination of spectrograms, can simulate the appearance of woven or knitted fabric on the basis of the spectral analysis. This allows one, still before the weaving or knitting process, to assess the appearance of a flat fabric that will be made of the yarn under analysis. However, this assessment is of a subjective character.

Apparatus UT5

UT5 constitutes a multifunctional measurement system with a modular structure allowing the determination of the basic qualitative parameters of yarns and intermediate spinning products (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Apparatus UT5 model S800.

A typical measurement UT5 set consists of the main apparatus containing the modules for measuring selected qualitative parameters of yarn: unwinding creel, printer, and computer with dedicated software.

The basic modules of UT5 include module TH for measuring humidity and temperature, module CS for measuring the fiber stream irregularity, and module FM for a fast detecting foreign substances in yarn.

The modules optionally appearing in UT5 include MS module for measuring thick wool slivers, sensor OM dedicated for the determination of the diameter, rotundity, density, and surface structure of yarn. UT5 is equipped with sensor OH for measuring the yarn hairiness, and module OI for measuring the dust and foreign particles in the yarn structure. UT5 model S800 used in the tests was equipped with an automatic system of the exchange of the sample tested (Table 1).

UT5 modules

ModulesAcronymFunctions
Temperature and humidity sensorTHMeasurement of humidity and temperature in the surrounding of the tester
Foreign matter sensorFMDetection of foreign matters in yarn
Capacitive sensorCSMeasurement of the yarn irregularity
Optical multifunctional sensorOMDetermination of the yarn diameter, roundness, density, and structure
Optical hairiness sensorOHMeasurement of yarn hairiness
MS sensorMSMeasurement of thick slivers
Optical impurity sensorOITesting impurities and dust in yarn
Fineness automaticFAMeasurement of the yarn purity
Automatic changerATAutomatic transport of yarn from changer to the measurement slot
Material for testing

Wool and wool-like yarns made by various spinning techniques, including classic single yarns, Siro Spun, and compact yarns were tested. Table 2 presents the characteristics of yarn. To use the wool in the technological process, in variants C, F, and G, it was treated with hypochlorite followed by resin treatment. The fabrics made of this yarn are suitable for washing and mechanical drying. Some yarns were subjected to the treatment with paraffin wax.

Characteristics of the yarns tested

Yarn variantTechnologyComposition of raw materialsLinear density [tex]Twist [twist/m]Paraffin
ACompact100% wool21.7590 ZYes
BClassic100% wool25.0620 ZNo
CClassic25% silk, 75% wool27.7550 ZYes
DSiro Spun100% wool31.2650 SNo
EClassic15% polyamide, 85% wool27.7580 ZNo
FClassic100% wool18.2650 ZYes
GCompact100% wool27.7560 ZNo
HClassic100% wool25.0530 ZNo
IClassic100% wool15.6700 ZNo
JClassic100% wool35.7420 ZNo
KClassic100% wool13.9750 ZNo
Test results of the yarn qualitative parameters

The basic qualitative parameters of yarns were determined in the spinning metrological laboratory. Apart from the determination of the yarn real linear density, a complete analysis of the yarn quality was carried out with the use of UT5 and strength parameters (Uster Tensojet 4) and twist (Twistmatic—Plus Code 2532). The test results obtained are listed in Table 3. For each measurement of the yarns analyzed by means of UT5, a spectrogram was prepared. As the spectrograms of various yarn variants were slightly different, a typical spectrogram of yarn variant K is shown in Figure 2.

List of the measurement results of the yarn qualitative parameters

YarnUster Tester 5Uster TensojetTwistmaticTt
CV%Thin placesThick placesNepsHairinessIndexElongation at breakTenacityTwist
1 m10 m−40%−50%+35%+50%+140%+200%%CV%cN/textwist/mTex
A16.066.173.55430.057.5172.510.010.005.111.0510.5237.759.14596Z21.8
B16.065.652.43437.545.0242.515.07.52.55.731.106.6225.738.23610Z25.0
C13.764.942.1595.02.595.07.522.55.05.171.027.7113.3015.31564Z24.0
D15.195.252.25312.532.5142.510.02.50.04.791.168.7829.108.70659S31.4
E18.416.532.53920.0177.5372.527.520.02.56.231.1116.8329.229.51568Z28.0
F17.756.283.19777.5115.0315.047.582.530.06.101.065.6130.367.67667Z18.8
G15.885.602.77415.050.0202.520.042.517.56.531.065.9928.238.40573Z23.5
H17.996.833.50820.0122.5305.017.522.55.06.361.089.6439.077.76520Z25.8
I19.006.512.871228.0242.5442.567.5117.520.05.201.0911.0943.147.80718Z15.8
J17.126.192.70622.592.5250.022.55.00.07.401.1210.0835.647.66411Z35.8
K17.925.862.55875.0177.5377.545.0320.050.05.291.0812.4741.968.51755Z13.8

Figure 2

Spectrogram of the linear density distribution of the fiber stream in yarn K.

Based on the linear density distribution of the yarn analyzed, UT5 apparatus can visualize the predicted appearance of woven or knitted fabric that will be made of this yarn. Such visualization was made for each of the yarn analyzed and the typical results are presented in Figures 3 and 4.

Figure 3

Predicted appearance of flat textiles: (a) woven fabric and (b) knitted fabric, obtained by means of Uster Tester 5 for yarn A.

Figure 4

Predicted appearance of flat textiles: (a) woven fabric and (b) knitted fabric, obtained by means of Uster Tester 5 for yarn E.

The yarns analyzed are characterized by a relatively low quality. They were selected so as to make the analysis results and the visualization of the predicted appearance of woven and knitted fabrics distinctly distinguishable.

The direct assessment of the quality of woven and knitted fabrics on the basis of their visualization by means of UT5 is to a large extent a subjective matter. Only a digital analysis of the image can eliminate this subjectivity in assessment.

Image analysis

In the case of yarns with considerably different quality parameters, the assessment of the predicted appearance of woven or knitted fabric, presented by UT5, does not give rise to greater problems, although the criteria of this assessment are of subjective character. On the other hand, in the case of yarns with similar qualitative parameters, the images of the predicted appearance of flat textiles will also be similar and consequently their assessment will not be unambiguous. To eliminate the subjectivity of the assessment made, one should find support in programs and methods that would make the analyses performed more objective [6,7,8].

Image analysis is a tool that makes it possible to distinguish information from an image by means of appropriated program transformations. The method proposed is based on the measurement of the average brightness of digital images and determination of the standard deviation of the image brightness. The average image brightness is an arithmetic average of the matrix generated on the basis of the brightness of single pixels forming an image.

Each digital image is consisted of pixels—some quantity of the smallest homogeneous elements that represent the given color or shade of grayness. Presenting an image as a pixel network, one can build a matrix with the quantity of lines and columns corresponding to the image width and height as shown in Figure 5 [9].

Figure 5

An example of pixel network: (a) image 10 × 10 and (b) matrix built on the basis of image.

The image pixels in the scale of grayness are described by means of a number from 0 to 255. Digit 0 indicates black pixel and number 255 indicates white pixel. The values between 0 and 255 constitute appropriate shades from the grayness scale. A pixel defined by number 100 will be darker than defined with number 101 or 200.

By means of appropriate computer software for each image, one can determine the basic statistic quantities such as the average image brightness that is an arithmetic average of the matrix and standard deviation. The image transformation into matrix and then the determination of image parameters can be performed by means of a script written in programing language Python. Python is a versatile language making it possible to form Internet links, image analysis or creating games, and report generation. To start the script, it is indispensable to have the Python language distributor. An example of such a program used in this study is Anaconda in the version of Python 2.7 [10].

As the yarns used in this study are weaving yarns, the computer analysis was carried out only for the images representing the predicted appearance of woven fabrics made of particular yarns. After performing a preliminary analysis and the optimization of the method, the average brightness was determined and then the standard deviation of the image was divided into 50 elements with dimensions 368 × 111 pixels. The scheme of the image division into 50 even rectangles is presented in Figure 6.

Figure 6

Diagram of image division.

All the digital images of woven fabrics made of particular yarns were analyzed. Table 4 presents the values of the standard deviation of image brightness of the yarns tested.

Measurement results of the standard deviation of the woven fabric image brightness

Yarn variantStandard deviation of the average brightness of the predicted fabric appearance
A7.07
B7.56
C7.61
D7.82
E8.08
F8.08
G8.09
H8.31
I8.42
J8.81
K8.98

Based on the measurement results of the standard deviation of the average image brightness, the diagrams of the standard deviation dependence of the average image brightness on the measurement results of the yarn qualitative parameters were prepared. Typical dependences are presented in Figures 7–9. The linear equation of regression and coefficient of R2 determination for the dependence tested are given in the diagrams.

Figure 7

Diagram of the standard deviation dependence of the fabric image brightness as a function of the variability of the yarn linear density on short sections.

Figure 8

Diagram of the standard deviation dependence of the fabric image brightness as a function of the number of thin places at a level of −40%.

Figure 9

Diagram of the standard deviation dependence of the fabric image brightness as a function of yarn hairiness.

Based on the measurement of the coefficient of R2 determination, the correlation of the yarn qualitative parameters was determined in relation to the results of the image analysis performed. Table 5 presents the scale used as a base to determine the degree of fitting the regression equation to the data [9].

Degree of fitting the regression equation to the data

Degree of fittingNumber range
Unsatisfying fitting0.00:0.50
Weak fitting0.50:0.60
Satisfying fitting0.60:0.75
Goof fitting0.75:0.90
Very good fitting0.90:1.00

The measurement results of the coefficient of R2 determination for particular qualitative parameters of yarns having an influence on the image form are listed in Table 6.

Degree of fitting the regression equation to the data

Qualitative parameterCoefficient of R2 determinationDegree of fitting
CV0.91Very good fitting
CV 1 m0.70Satisfactory fitting
CV 10 m0.10Unsatisfactory fitting
Thin places −40%0.91Very good fitting
Thin places −50%0.85Good fitting
Thick places +35%0.89Good fitting
Thick places +50%0.49Unsatisfactory fitting
Neps +140%0.09Unsatisfactory fitting
Neps +200%0.05Unsatisfactory fitting
Hairiness0.04Unsatisfactory fitting
Index0.10Unsatisfactory fitting
Summary

The appearance of woven fabric is significantly affected by the irregularity of the yarn linear density on short sections and thick places at a level of −40% (very good fitting) and thick places at a level of +35% and thin places at a level of −50% (good fitting). The variability of the yarn linear density on 1 m sections shows a satisfactory degree of fitting to the standard deviation of average image brightness. The remaining parameters have no significant effect on the fabric appearance (unsatisfactory fitting).

From further analysis of results, it follows that the greater the length on which the irregularity of the yarn linear density is tested, the lower is the degree of fitting to the standard deviation of the average brightness. The long-section irregularity of yarn (CV10 m) does not show any effect on the woven fabric appearance, but this may be conditioned by a too small size of the image under analysis. The woven fabric appearance is affected only by the periodically appearing errors—the greater the value of the yarn linear density variability, the greater the probability of the occurrence of periodical distribution of error in the yarn. Errors such as neps or thick places do not always occur on the whole yarn circumference—part of them can remain in hiding, making no visual defect on the fabric surface. The situation is different in the case of thin places. Each thin place is visible on the entire circumference of the yarn, which causes a significant impact of this parameter on the appearance of the fabric.

Hairiness has no effect on the predicted fabric appearance, since it does not influence the regularity of the yarn linear density [11, 12].

Figure 1

Apparatus UT5 model S800.
Apparatus UT5 model S800.

Figure 2

Spectrogram of the linear density distribution of the fiber stream in yarn K.
Spectrogram of the linear density distribution of the fiber stream in yarn K.

Figure 3

Predicted appearance of flat textiles: (a) woven fabric and (b) knitted fabric, obtained by means of Uster Tester 5 for yarn A.
Predicted appearance of flat textiles: (a) woven fabric and (b) knitted fabric, obtained by means of Uster Tester 5 for yarn A.

Figure 4

Predicted appearance of flat textiles: (a) woven fabric and (b) knitted fabric, obtained by means of Uster Tester 5 for yarn E.
Predicted appearance of flat textiles: (a) woven fabric and (b) knitted fabric, obtained by means of Uster Tester 5 for yarn E.

Figure 5

An example of pixel network: (a) image 10 × 10 and (b) matrix built on the basis of image.
An example of pixel network: (a) image 10 × 10 and (b) matrix built on the basis of image.

Figure 6

Diagram of image division.
Diagram of image division.

Figure 7

Diagram of the standard deviation dependence of the fabric image brightness as a function of the variability of the yarn linear density on short sections.
Diagram of the standard deviation dependence of the fabric image brightness as a function of the variability of the yarn linear density on short sections.

Figure 8

Diagram of the standard deviation dependence of the fabric image brightness as a function of the number of thin places at a level of −40%.
Diagram of the standard deviation dependence of the fabric image brightness as a function of the number of thin places at a level of −40%.

Figure 9

Diagram of the standard deviation dependence of the fabric image brightness as a function of yarn hairiness.
Diagram of the standard deviation dependence of the fabric image brightness as a function of yarn hairiness.

List of the measurement results of the yarn qualitative parameters

Yarn Uster Tester 5 Uster Tensojet Twistmatic Tt
CV% Thin places Thick places Neps Hairiness Index Elongation at break Tenacity Twist
1 m 10 m −40% −50% +35% +50% +140% +200% % CV% cN/tex twist/m Tex
A 16.06 6.17 3.55 430.0 57.5 172.5 10.0 10.0 0 5.11 1.05 10.52 37.75 9.14 596Z 21.8
B 16.06 5.65 2.43 437.5 45.0 242.5 15.0 7.5 2.5 5.73 1.10 6.62 25.73 8.23 610Z 25.0
C 13.76 4.94 2.15 95.0 2.5 95.0 7.5 22.5 5.0 5.17 1.02 7.71 13.30 15.31 564Z 24.0
D 15.19 5.25 2.25 312.5 32.5 142.5 10.0 2.5 0.0 4.79 1.16 8.78 29.10 8.70 659S 31.4
E 18.41 6.53 2.53 920.0 177.5 372.5 27.5 20.0 2.5 6.23 1.11 16.83 29.22 9.51 568Z 28.0
F 17.75 6.28 3.19 777.5 115.0 315.0 47.5 82.5 30.0 6.10 1.06 5.61 30.36 7.67 667Z 18.8
G 15.88 5.60 2.77 415.0 50.0 202.5 20.0 42.5 17.5 6.53 1.06 5.99 28.23 8.40 573Z 23.5
H 17.99 6.83 3.50 820.0 122.5 305.0 17.5 22.5 5.0 6.36 1.08 9.64 39.07 7.76 520Z 25.8
I 19.00 6.51 2.87 1228.0 242.5 442.5 67.5 117.5 20.0 5.20 1.09 11.09 43.14 7.80 718Z 15.8
J 17.12 6.19 2.70 622.5 92.5 250.0 22.5 5.0 0.0 7.40 1.12 10.08 35.64 7.66 411Z 35.8
K 17.92 5.86 2.55 875.0 177.5 377.5 45.0 320.0 50.0 5.29 1.08 12.47 41.96 8.51 755Z 13.8

Characteristics of the yarns tested

Yarn variant Technology Composition of raw materials Linear density [tex] Twist [twist/m] Paraffin
A Compact 100% wool 21.7 590 Z Yes
B Classic 100% wool 25.0 620 Z No
C Classic 25% silk, 75% wool 27.7 550 Z Yes
D Siro Spun 100% wool 31.2 650 S No
E Classic 15% polyamide, 85% wool 27.7 580 Z No
F Classic 100% wool 18.2 650 Z Yes
G Compact 100% wool 27.7 560 Z No
H Classic 100% wool 25.0 530 Z No
I Classic 100% wool 15.6 700 Z No
J Classic 100% wool 35.7 420 Z No
K Classic 100% wool 13.9 750 Z No

Measurement results of the standard deviation of the woven fabric image brightness

Yarn variant Standard deviation of the average brightness of the predicted fabric appearance
A 7.07
B 7.56
C 7.61
D 7.82
E 8.08
F 8.08
G 8.09
H 8.31
I 8.42
J 8.81
K 8.98

UT5 modules

Modules Acronym Functions
Temperature and humidity sensor TH Measurement of humidity and temperature in the surrounding of the tester
Foreign matter sensor FM Detection of foreign matters in yarn
Capacitive sensor CS Measurement of the yarn irregularity
Optical multifunctional sensor OM Determination of the yarn diameter, roundness, density, and structure
Optical hairiness sensor OH Measurement of yarn hairiness
MS sensor MS Measurement of thick slivers
Optical impurity sensor OI Testing impurities and dust in yarn
Fineness automatic FA Measurement of the yarn purity
Automatic changer AT Automatic transport of yarn from changer to the measurement slot

Degree of fitting the regression equation to the data

Qualitative parameter Coefficient of R2 determination Degree of fitting
CV 0.91 Very good fitting
CV 1 m 0.70 Satisfactory fitting
CV 10 m 0.10 Unsatisfactory fitting
Thin places −40% 0.91 Very good fitting
Thin places −50% 0.85 Good fitting
Thick places +35% 0.89 Good fitting
Thick places +50% 0.49 Unsatisfactory fitting
Neps +140% 0.09 Unsatisfactory fitting
Neps +200% 0.05 Unsatisfactory fitting
Hairiness 0.04 Unsatisfactory fitting
Index 0.10 Unsatisfactory fitting

Idzik, M. (2009, December). Computer analysis distribution of the yarn linear density from open end spinning machine. Autex Research Journal, 9(4). IdzikM. 2009 December Computer analysis distribution of the yarn linear density from open end spinning machine Autex Research Journal 9 4 Search in Google Scholar

Idzik, M. (2018, Jume). Analysis of changes in fiber density distribution in a cotton combed spinning system using modified regulation of the sliver draft. Autex Research Journal, 19(1), 54–59. IdzikM. 2018 June Analysis of changes in fiber density distribution in a cotton combed spinning system using modified regulation of the sliver draft Autex Research Journal 19 1 54 59 10.1515/aut-2018-0022 Search in Google Scholar

Idzik, M. (2003). Effect of operating a control system on linear density distribution of a fibre stream. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 11(1), 40. IdzikM. 2003 Effect of operating a control system on linear density distribution of a fibre stream Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 11 1 40 Search in Google Scholar

Rutkowski, J. (2018). Analysis of the strength parameters of worsted and component spun yarns after the rewinding process. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 26(2), 128. RutkowskiJ. 2018 Analysis of the strength parameters of worsted and component spun yarns after the rewinding process Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 26 2 128 10.5604/01.3001.0011.5736 Search in Google Scholar

Rutkowski, J. (2011). Tenacity of cotton yarns joined during the rewinding process. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 19(1), 84. RutkowskiJ. 2011 Tenacity of cotton yarns joined during the rewinding process Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 19 1 84 Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, D., Merhof, D. (2015). Blind weave detection for woven fabrics. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 18(3). SchneiderD. MerhofD. 2015 Blind weave detection for woven fabrics Pattern Analysis and Applications 18 3 10.1007/s10044-014-0403-9 Search in Google Scholar

Sudha, R., Chitraa, Dr. V. (2018). Digital image processing technology for measuring yarn hairiness in the field of textile. CIIT International Journal of Digital Image Processing, 10(1). SudhaR. ChitraaDr. V. 2018 Digital image processing technology for measuring yarn hairiness in the field of textile CIIT International Journal of Digital Image Processing 10 1 Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Wang, J., Pan, R., Zhou, J., Gao, W. (2018). A computer vision-based system for automatic detection of misarranged warp yarns in yarn-dyed fabric. Part I: Continuous segmentation of warp yarns. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 109(5), 577–584. ZhangJ. WangJ. PanR. ZhouJ. GaoW. 2018 A computer vision-based system for automatic detection of misarranged warp yarns in yarn-dyed fabric. Part I: Continuous segmentation of warp yarns The Journal of the Textile Institute 109 5 577 584 10.1080/00405000.2017.1361580 Search in Google Scholar

Cyganek, B. (2002). Komputerowe przetwarzanie obrazów trójwymiarowych. EXIT. CyganekB. 2002 Komputerowe przetwarzanie obrazów trójwymiarowych EXIT. Search in Google Scholar

Szufler, P. (2018). Analiza danych i symulacje w języku Python. Web site: https://szufel.pl/python/Symulacje_i_analiza_danych_w_jezyku_Python_v4.2.pdf. (Accessed 19.07.2018). SzuflerP. 2018 Analiza danych i symulacje w języku Python Web site: https://szufel.pl/python/Symulacje_i_analiza_danych_w_jezyku_Python_v4.2.pdf. (Accessed 19.07.2018). Search in Google Scholar

Atlas, S., Kadoğlu, H. (2006). Determining fibre properties and linear density effect on cotton yarn hairiness in ring spinning. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 14(3), 57. AtlasS. KadoğluH. 2006 Determining fibre properties and linear density effect on cotton yarn hairiness in ring spinning Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 14 3 57 Search in Google Scholar

Technikova, L., Tunak, M. (2013). Weaving density evaluation with the aid of image analysis. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 21(2), 98. TechnikovaL. TunakM. 2013 Weaving density evaluation with the aid of image analysis Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 21 2 98 Search in Google Scholar

Olczyk, A. (2017). Analiza spektralna jako metoda oceny przydatności przędz do produkcji płaskich wyrobów tekstylnych. Engineering work – supervisor dr inż. M. Idzik, prof. PŁ. OlczykA. 2017 Analiza spektralna jako metoda oceny przydatności przędz do produkcji płaskich wyrobów tekstylnych Engineering work – supervisor dr inż. M. Idzik, prof. PŁ. Search in Google Scholar

Sankowski, D., Mosorov, W., Strzecha, K. (2011). Przetwarzanie i analiza obrazów w systemach przemysłowych. PWN. SankowskiD. MosorovW. StrzechaK. 2011 Przetwarzanie i analiza obrazów w systemach przemysłowych PWN Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo