1. bookVolume 26 (2021): Issue 3 (September 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2719-9452
First Published
01 Jan 2006
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English, Polish
Open Access

Is the Traditional Method of Regulation (the Legislative Act) Sufficient to Regulate Artificial Intelligence, or Should It Also Be Regulated by an Algorithmic Code?

Published Online: 22 Oct 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 26 (2021) - Issue 3 (September 2021)
Page range: 43 - 60
Received: 01 Sep 2021
Accepted: 15 Sep 2021
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2719-9452
First Published
01 Jan 2006
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English, Polish
Abstract

The issue of the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the significant challenges faced by the EU at present. Most researchers focus on the substantive scope of AI regulation, including state law, ethical norms and soft law. In addition to the substantive and legal scope of the regulation, it is worthwhile considering the manner of such regulation.1 Since AI is an algorithmic code, it seems correct to regulate (restrict) AI not so much with traditional law established in natural (human) language as with one implemented into algorithms. They may operate as a tool supporting traditional legislation (RegTech), but it is possible to go further with the issue and create regulation algorithms which implement the law as the effective law. However, this requires a new approach to law and legislation – the law as algorithmic code.

Keywords

Aires J., Pinheiro D., Strube de Lima V. and Meneguzzi F., Norm conflict identification in contracts, “Artificial Intelligence and Law” 2017, vol. 25.10.1007/s10506-017-9205-x Search in Google Scholar

Araszkiewicz M.: Algorytmizacja myślenia prawniczego. Modele, możliwości, ograniczenia, (in:) D. Szostek (ed.), Legal tech. Czyli jak bezpiecznie korzystać z narzędzi informatycznych w organizacji, w tym w kancelarii oraz dziale prawnym, Warsaw 2021. Search in Google Scholar

Artificial Intelligence (AI): new developments and innovations applied to e-commerce, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_IDA(2020)648791. Search in Google Scholar

Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in Tension, 01.11.2018, https://www.informationpolicycentre.com/uploads/5/7/1/0/57104281/cipl_ai_first_report_-_artificial_intelligence_and_data_protection_in_te....pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Australian Government, Artificial Intelligence: Solving problems, growing the economy and improving our quality of life, 20.12.2019, https://data61.csiro.au/en/Our-Research/Our-Work/AI-Roadmap. Search in Google Scholar

Badiul Islam M. and Governatori G., RuleRS: A Rule-Based Architecture for Decision Support Systems, “Artificial Intelligence and Law” 2018, vol. 26.10.1007/s10506-018-9218-0 Search in Google Scholar

Barfield W. and Pagallo U., Law and AI, Cheltenham/Northampton 2020. Search in Google Scholar

Barton T.D., Haapio H., Passera S. and Hazard J.G., Successful Contracts: Integrating Design and Technology, (in:) M. Corrales, M. Fenwick and N. Forgó (eds.), Robotics, AI and the Future of Law, Singapore 2018.10.1007/978-981-13-6086-2_3 Search in Google Scholar

Boulet R., Mazzega P. and Bourcier D., Network Approach to the French System of Legal Codes, part II: The Role of the Weights in a Network, “Artificial Intelligence and Law” 2018, vol. 26.10.1007/s10506-017-9204-y Search in Google Scholar

Chinen M., Law and Autonomous Machines, Cheltenham 2019.10.4337/9781786436597 Search in Google Scholar

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Artificial Intelligence for Europe, Brussels (COM(2018) 237), 25.04.2018, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2018%3A237%3AFIN. Search in Google Scholar

Corrales M., Fenwick M. and Haapio H., Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain, Singapore 2019.10.1007/978-981-13-6086-2 Search in Google Scholar

Cyrul W., LegalTech a tworzenie i publikacja tekstów prawnych, (in:) D. Szostek (ed.), Legal Tech. Czyli jak bezpiecznie korzystać z narzędzi informatycznych w organizacji, w tym w kancelarii oraz dziale prawnym, Warsaw 2021. Search in Google Scholar

Declaration by the Committee of Ministers on the manipulative capabilities of algorithmic processes, 13.02.2019. Search in Google Scholar

eIDAS Regulation, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eidas-regulation. Search in Google Scholar

EU guidelines on ethics in artificial intelligence: Context and implementation, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/640163/EPRS_BRI(2019)640163_EN.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

European Artificial Intelligence (AI) leadership, the path for an integrated vision https://nws.eurocities.eu/MediaShell/media/European_AI_study.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

European Commission For The Efficiency Of Justice, European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems, Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection T-PD(2019)01, 14.04.2021. Search in Google Scholar

Executive Office of the President of the United States, 2016–2019 Progress report: Advancing artificial intelligence R&D (November 2019), https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/AI-Research-and-Development-Progress-Report-2016–2019.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Feldstein S., The Global Expansion and AI Surveillance, Washington 2019. Search in Google Scholar

Fenwick M., Vermeulen E.P.M. and Corrales M., Business and Regulatory Responses to Artificial Intelligence: Dynamic Regulation, Innovation Ecosystems and the Strategic Management of Disruptive Technology, (in:) M. Corrales, M. Fenwick and Nikolaus Forgó (eds.), Robotics, AI and the Future of Law, Singapore 2018.10.1007/978-981-13-2874-9_4 Search in Google Scholar

Finlay S., Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Business, Great Britain 2018. Search in Google Scholar

Gautrais V., Lex Electronica: d’aujourd’hiu a demain, “Lex Electronica” 2016, http://www.lex-electronica.org/articles/volume-21/lex-electronica-daujourdhui-a-demain. Search in Google Scholar

Governatori G., Idelberger F., Milosevic Z., Riveret R., Sartor G. and Xu X., On legal contracts, imperative and declarative smart contracts, and blockchain system, “Artificial Intelligence and Law” 2018, vol. 26.10.1007/s10506-018-9223-3 Search in Google Scholar

Harasimiuk D. E. and Braun T., Regulating Artificial Intelligence. Binary Ethics and the law, London/New York 2021.10.4324/9781003134725 Search in Google Scholar

Hartung M., Bues M. and Halblieb G., Legal Tech, Baden-Baden 2018. Search in Google Scholar

Hildebrandt M., Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law, Northampton 2016.10.4337/9781849808774 Search in Google Scholar

Interpol Innovation Centre, Singapore, Innovation Report Artificial Intelligence, https://media.licdn.com/dms/document/C4E1FAQHbuEqCSHEUsQ/feedshare-document-pdf-analyzed/0?e=1549350000&v=beta&t=lpYHjU3SizFf82swBk3g33TLFqWGRy8EjbKyhLPsST0. Search in Google Scholar

Johnson D. R. and Post D., Law And Borders: the Rise of Law in Cyberspace, “Stanford Law Review” 1996, vol. 48, no. 5.10.2307/1229390 Search in Google Scholar

Kerikmäe T. (ed.) Regulating eTechnologies in the European Union. Normative Realities and Trends, Cham 2014.10.1007/978-3-319-08117-5 Search in Google Scholar

Krasuski A., Status sztucznego agenta. Podstawy zastosowania sztucznej inteligencji, Warsaw 2021. Search in Google Scholar

Kulesza J., Międzynarodowe prawo Internetu, Poznań 2010. Search in Google Scholar

Lai L. and Świerczyński M. (eds.), Prawo Sztucznej Inteligencji, Warsaw 2020. Search in Google Scholar

Leens R., Regulating New Technologies in Times of Change, (in:) L. Reins (ed.), Regulating New Technologies in Uncertain Times, Cham 2019.10.1007/978-94-6265-279-8_1 Search in Google Scholar

Lessig L., Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, New York 1999. Search in Google Scholar

Lessig L., Code is Law: On Liberty in Cyberspace, “Harvard Magazine”, https://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-html. Search in Google Scholar

Liability for Artificial Intelligence and other emerging digital technologies: Report from the Expert Group on Liability and New Technologies – New Technologies Formation, https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm?do=groupDetail.groupMeetingDoc&docid=36608. Search in Google Scholar

M. Hildebrandt, Algorithmic Regulation and the Rule of Law, “Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A” 2018, vol. 376, issue 2128, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2017.0355.10.1098/rsta.2017.0355 Search in Google Scholar

Magnusson Sjöberg C., Legal Automation, AI and Law Revisited, (in:) M. Corrales, M. Fenwick and Haapio H., Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain, Singapore 2019.10.1007/978-981-13-6086-2_7 Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy J., Minsky M.L., Rochester N. and Shannon C.E., A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence http://jmc.stanford.edu/articles/dartmouth/dartmouth.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Menthe D.C., Jurisdiction in Cyberspace: a Theory of International Spaces, “Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review” 1998, no. 69. Search in Google Scholar

Minsky M., Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry, Massachusetts 1969. Search in Google Scholar

Minsky M., The Emotion Machine. Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of the Human Mind, New York/London/Toronto/Sydney 2007. Search in Google Scholar

Nanda R., Siragusa G., Di Caro L., Boella G., Grossio L., Gerbaudo M. and Costamanga F., Unsupervised and Supervised Text Similarity Systems for Automated Identification of National Implementing Measures of European Directives, “Artificial Intelligence and Law” 2019, vol. 27.10.1007/s10506-018-9236-y Search in Google Scholar

National Artificial Intelligence Strategy of the Czech Republic, https://www.mpo.cz/assets/en/guidepost/for-the-media/pressreleases/2019/5/NAIS_eng_web.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Prabucki R., Szostek D. and Wyczik J., Prawo jako kod, (in:) D. Szostek (ed.), Legal tech. Czyli jak bezpiecznie korzystać z narzędzi informatycznych w organizacji, w tym w kancelarii oraz dziale prawnym, Warsaw 2021. Search in Google Scholar

Proposal For A Regulation Of The European Parliament And Of The Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules On Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) And Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts Com/2021/206 Final, https://Eur-Lex.Europa.Eu/Legal-Content/EN/TXT/?Uri=CELEX:52021PC0206. Search in Google Scholar

Railas L., The Rise of the Lex Electronica and the International Sale of Goods, Helsinki 2004. Search in Google Scholar

Recommendation of Committee of Ministers No. 2102 (2017) about technological convergence, artificial intelligence and human rights (Doc. 14432). Search in Google Scholar

Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence, OECD, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449. Search in Google Scholar

Recommendations on regulation, innovation and finance: Final Report to the European Commission, 01.12.2019, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/business_economy_euro/banking_and_finance/documents/191113-report-expert-group-regulatory-obstacles-financial-innovation_en.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Report with recommendations to the Commission on a civil liability regime for artificial intelligence (2020/2014(INL)), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9–2020-0178_EN.html. Search in Google Scholar

Responsibility and AI: Council of Europe study, 21.12.2019, https://rm.coe.int/responsability-and-ai-en/168097d9c5. Search in Google Scholar

Schrebak S., Integrating Computer Science into Legal Discipline: The Rise of Legal Programming, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2496094. Search in Google Scholar

Szostek D. (ed.), Legal tech. Czyli jak bezpiecznie korzystać z narzędzi informatycznych w organizacji, w tym w kancelarii oraz dziale prawnym, Warsaw 2021. Search in Google Scholar

Szostek D., Blockchain and Law, Baden-Baden 2019.10.5771/9783845298290 Search in Google Scholar

Szostek D., Czynność prawna a środki komunikacji elektronicznej, Krakow 2004. Search in Google Scholar

Szostek D., Sztuczna inteligencja a kody. Czy rozwiązaniem dla uregulowania sztucznej inteligencji jest smart contract i blockchain? (in:) L. Lai and M. Świerczyński (eds.), Prawo Sztucznej Inteligencji, Warsaw 2020. Search in Google Scholar

Szpringer W., Blockchain jako innowacja systemowa. Od Internetu informacji do Internetu wartości, Warsaw 2018. Search in Google Scholar

Świerczyński M. and Lai L., Prawo Sztucznej Inteligencji, Warsaw 2020. Search in Google Scholar

Tegmark M., Życie 3.0. Człowiek w Erze sztucznej Inteligencji, Warsaw 2019. Search in Google Scholar

The European Commission’s high-level expert group on artificial intelligence, A definition of AI: Main capabilities and scientific disciplines. Definition developed for the purpose of the deliverables of the High-Level Expert Group on AI, Brussels, 18.12.2018, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/definition-artificial-intelligence-main-capabilities-and-scientific-disciplines. Search in Google Scholar

The High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence European Commission Directorate-General for Communications Networks Technology, 20.09.2018. Search in Google Scholar

Trudel P., La lex electronica, (in:) C.A. Morand (ed.), Le droit saisi par la mondialisation, Brussels 2001. Search in Google Scholar

Turing A., Computing Machinery and Intelligence, “Mind” 1950, vol. 49, no. 236.10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433 Search in Google Scholar

Turner J., Robot Rules. Regulating Artificial Intelligence, Cham 2019.10.1007/978-3-319-96235-1 Search in Google Scholar

Wendehorst C.H., Safety and Liability Related Aspect of Software, 17.06.2021, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/study-safety-and-liability-related-aspects-software. Search in Google Scholar

Werbach K., The Blockchain and the New Architecture of Trust, London 2018.10.7551/mitpress/11449.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

White Paper On Artificial Intelligence. A European approach to excellence and trust, COM(2020) 65 final, European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/commission-white-paper-artificial-intelligence-feb2020_en.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Wiebe A., Die elektronische Willenserklarung, Tubingen 2002. Search in Google Scholar

Wood G., Ethereum: A Secure Decentralized Generalized Transaction Ledger (EIP-150 revision), http://gavwood.com/Paper.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Wright N.D. (ed.), Artificial Intelligence, China, Russia, and the Global Order, Maxwell 2019. Search in Google Scholar

Yao M., Jia M. and Zhou A., Applied Artificial Intelligence. A Handbook for Business Leaders, Middletown 2018. Search in Google Scholar

Zalewski T., Definicja sztucznej inteligencji, (in:) L. Lai and M. Swierczyński (eds.), Prawo Sztucznej Inteligencji, Warsaw 2020. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo