1. bookVolume 16 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1407-6179
First Published
20 Mar 2000
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Proposal Of Landfill Site Model In The Particular Territory

Published Online: 24 Nov 2015
Volume & Issue: Volume 16 (2015) - Issue 4 (December 2015)
Page range: 320 - 329
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1407-6179
First Published
20 Mar 2000
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English

1. Brožova, H., Houška, M., Šubrt, T. (2003) Modely pro vícekriteriální rozhodování. Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze, Prague: CREDIT, ISBN 80-213-1019-7, 178 p.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bonissone, P. P. (1998) Determination of Weight Vector (cardinal ratio scale) from Pairwise Comparisons. [online].Search in Google Scholar

3. Eko-Kom. (2011) Municipal waste. [online]. Prague. Available at: http://www.ekokom.cz.Search in Google Scholar

4. Fotr, J. et al. (2006) Manažerské rozhodování, Vyd. 1. Praha: Ekopress, ISBN 80-86929-15-9. 409 p.Search in Google Scholar

5. Kampf, R., Gašparík, J., Kudláčková, N. (2012) Application of different forms of transport in relation to the process of transport user value creation. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 40(2), pp. 71 – 75.10.3311/pp.tr.2012-2.05Search in Google Scholar

6. Kampf, R., Lizbetin, J., Lizbetinova, L. (2012) Requirements of a transport system user. Communications, 14(4), pp. 106-108.10.26552/com.C.2012.4.106-108Search in Google Scholar

7. Klein, G. A. et al. (1993) Decision making in action: Models and methods. Westport, CT, US: Ablex Publishing, 480 p.Search in Google Scholar

8. Míka, J., Kučerková, M. (2014) Logistics of the Disposal of Municipal Waste. In: LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Institut Jana Pernera, o.p.s., and Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice, Czech Republic, 1/2014, ISSN 1804-3216, pp. 88-92.Search in Google Scholar

9. Saaty, T. L. (1983) Priority Setting in Complex Problems, in Hansen, P. (Hrg.), Essays and Surveys on Multiple Criteria Decision Making. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Berlin/Heidelberg/NewYork: Springer-Verlag, pp. 140-155.Search in Google Scholar

10. Saaty, T. L. (1986) Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 32(7), pp. 841-847.10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841Search in Google Scholar

11. Saaty, T. L. (1990) Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 292 p.Search in Google Scholar

12. Saaty, T. L. (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), pp. 83-98.10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590Search in Google Scholar

13. Saaty, T. L., Vargas, L. G., Wendell, R. E. (1983) Assessing Attribute Weights by Ratios. Omega - The International Journal of Management Science, 2(1), pp. 9-13.Search in Google Scholar

14. Waste Management. (2012) Waste Management Information System. [online]. Available at: http://www1.cenia.cz/www/odpady/isoh.Search in Google Scholar

15. Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2011) Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(2), ISSN 2029-4913, pp. 397-427.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo