[Ashton, C., 2013. Final Report by the High Representative/Head of the EDA on the Common Security and Defence Policy. European Defence Agency (EDA) Annual Conference, (October), pp.1–27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bátora, J., 2009. European Defence Agency: A Flashpoint of Institutional Logics. West European Politics, 32(6), pp.1075–1098.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beck, U., 2008. Reframing Power in the Globalized World. Organization Studies, 29(5), pp.793–804.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biscop, S., 2012. The UK and European defence: Leading or leaving? International Affairs, 88(6), pp.1297–1313.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biscop, S., 2016a. The EU Global Strategy: Realpolitik with European Characteristics. Security Policy Brief, 75 (June).]Search in Google Scholar
[Biscop, S., 2016b. All or nothing? The EU Global Strategy and defence policy after the Brexit. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(3), pp.431–445.]Search in Google Scholar
[Council of the European Union, 2010. Council conclusions on Military Capability Development.]Search in Google Scholar
[Council of the European Union, 2016a. Council conclusions on implementing the EU Global Strategy in the area of Security and Defence.]Search in Google Scholar
[Council of the European Union, 2016b. Implementation Plan on Security and Defence, (November), pp.1–31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deutsch, K.W. et al., 1957. Political community and the North Atlantic area : international organization in the light of historical experience, Princeton (N.J.): Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Diez, T., Von Lucke, F. & Wellmann, Z., 2016. The Securitisation of Climate: Change Actors, Processes and Consequences, Abingdon: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dijkstra, H., 2012. The influence of EU officials in European Security and Defence. European Security, 21(3), pp.311–327.]Search in Google Scholar
[Duke, S., 2012. The EU, NATO and the Treaty of Lisbon: Still Divided Within a Common City. In: P. J. Cardwell, ed. EU External Relations Law and Policy in the Post-Lisbon Era, The Hague: Springer Science+Business Media BV, pp. 334–355.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission, 2013. Towards a more competitive and efficient defence and security sector. COM(2013) 542 final.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission, 2015a. In Defence of Europe. EPSC Strategic Notes, (4).]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission, 2015b. Roadmap: European Defence Action Plan.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission, 2016. European Defence Action Plan. COM(2016) 950 final.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission, 2017. White Paper on the Future of Europe.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Defence Agency, 2012a. European Defence Matters 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Defence Agency, 2012b. European Defence Matters 2.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Defence Agency, 2014. European Defence Matters 6.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Defence Agency, 2015a. European Defence Matters 7.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Defence Agency, 2015b. European Defence Matters 8.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Defence Agency, 2015c. European Defence Matters 9.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Defence Agency, 2016. European Defence Matters 11.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Parliament, 2016. Europeans in 2016: Perceptions and expectations, fight against terrorism and radicalisation. Special Eurobarometer of the European Parliament.]Search in Google Scholar
[Finnish Parliament, 2016. Minutes of the plenary session on 20 Oct 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[Finnish Parliament Committee for Foreign Affairs, 2016. Committee Report on the Government’s Foreign and Security Policy Report 9/2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fiott, D., 2015. The European Commission and the European Defence Agency: A Case of Rivalry? Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(3), pp.542–557.]Search in Google Scholar
[France & Finland, 2016. Declaration on strengthening the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy.]Search in Google Scholar
[Friis, K. & Rechborn-Kjennerud, E., 2016. From cyber threats to cyber risks. In: K. Friis & J. Ringsmose, eds. Conflict in Cyber Space: Theoretical, Strategic and Legal Perspectives. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge, pp. 27–44.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haas, E.B., 1961. International Integration: The European and the Universal Process. International Organization, 15(3), pp.366–392.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haas, E.B., 1968. The uniting of Europe : political, social, and economic forces 1950-1957, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hannikainen, L., 1994. The Continued Validity of the Dernilitarised and Neutralised Status of the Åland Islands. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 54(3), pp.614–651.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hannikainen, L. & Lundstedt, T., 2016. Kansainvälisen oikeuden rooli nyky-Venäjän ulkopolitiikassa. Finnish Ministry of Defence.]Search in Google Scholar
[Howorth, J., 2003. Why ESDP is Necessary and Beneficial for the Alliance. In: J. Howorth & J.T.S. Keeler (eds) Defending Europe: The EU, NATO, and the Quest for European Autonomy. Gordonsville, Virginia: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 219–238.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jokela, J., 2014. Multi-speed Europe ? Differentiated integration in the external relations of the EU. FIIA Report 38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koivula, T., 2016. The European Union and the Use of Military Force: Uncovering the Myths, Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Manners, I., 2002. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), pp.235–258.]Search in Google Scholar
[Manners, I., 2006. Normative Power Europe Reconsidered: Beyond the Crossroads. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), pp.182–199.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matlary, J.H., 2008. Much ado about little : the EU and human security. International Affairs, 84(1), pp.131–143.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mauro, F. & Thoma, K., 2016. The Future of EU Defence Research.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mogherini, F., 2016a. Opening Speech by High Representative/Vice-President Federica Mogherini at the 2016 EDA Conference.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mogherini, F., 2016b. Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy, Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moravcsik, A., 1998. The Choice for Europe : Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morozov, V., 2002. Human Rights and Foreign Policy Discourse in Today’s Russia: Romantic Realism and Securitisation of Identity. COPRI Working Papers (6/2002).]Search in Google Scholar
[Müller, P., 2016. EU foreign policy: no major breakthrough despite multiple crises. Journal of European Integration, 38(3), pp.359–374.]Search in Google Scholar
[Myntti, K., 2016. “Putin driver oss mot Nato”. Vasabladet 8 June 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[Niinistö, J., 2016a. Ahvenanmaan asia. Jussi Niinistö’s Blog.]Search in Google Scholar
[Niinistö, J., 2016b. Gotlanti ja Ahvenanmaa. Jussi Niinistö’s Blog.]Search in Google Scholar
[Norheim-Martinsen, P.M., 2013. The European Union and Military Force : Governance and Strategy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peck, T, 2016. Britain will veto EU army, says Defence Secretary. The Independent 17 September 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[Poullie, Y., 2016. Åland’s Demilitarisation and Neutralisation at the End of the Cold War – Parliamentary Discussions in Åland and Finland 1988–1995. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 23(2), pp.179–210.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prime Minister’s Office Finland, 2016. Finnish Foreign and Security Policy 2016 Government Report 6/2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prime Minister’s Office Finland, 2017. Government’s Defence Report. Government Report 5/2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rayroux, A., 2013. Speaking EU Defence at Home: Contentious Discourses and Constructive Ambiguity. Cooperation and Conflict, 49(3), pp.386–405.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rettman, A., 2016a. Finland calls for “pragmatic” EU defence. EUobserver, 27 Sep 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rettman, A., 2016b. Germany: Trump victory to spur EU military union. EUobserver, pp.2–5.]Search in Google Scholar
[Salonius-Pasternak, C., 2014. Tutkija Salonius-Pasternak: Suomi voisi olla sotilaallisen iskun ensimmäinen kohde. Helsingin Sanomat 29 Dec 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schroeder, U.C., 2011. The Organization of European Security Governance: Internal and External Security in Transition, Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tarkka, J., 2015. Ahvenanmaan asia. Etelä-Suomen Sanomat.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tiilikainen, T., 2002. The Åland Islands, Finland and European security, Mariehamn: The Åland Islands Peace Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Trybus, M., 2006. The new European Defence Agency: a contribution to the common European defence policy and a challenge to the community acquis? Common Market Law Review, 43(3), pp.667–703.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weiss, T., 2011. The blurring border between the police and the military: A debate without foundations. Cooperation and Conflict, 46(3), pp.396–405.]Search in Google Scholar
[Whitman, R.G., 2016. The UK and EU Foreign, Security and Defence Policy after Brexit: Integrated, Associated or Detached? National Institute Economic Review, (238), pp.43–50.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wodak, R., 2001. The Discourse-Historical Approach. In: R. Wodak & M. Meyer, eds. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE Publications, pp.63–94.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wodak, R., 2009. The discourse of politics in action: politics as usual, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wodak, R. & Boukala, S., 2016. Talking about Solidarity and Security in the Age of Crisis: The Revival of Nationalism and Protectionism in the European Union - A Discourse-Historical Approach. In: C. Carta, J.-F. Morin, & M. Telo, eds. EU Foreign Policy through the Lens of Discourse Analysis: Making Sense of Diversity. Farnham, Surrey, GBR: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ykkösaamu, 2016. Jussi Niinistö. Ykkösaamu, 15 Oct.]Search in Google Scholar
[Österdahl, I., 2009. The Neutral Ally: The European Security and Defence Policy and the Swedish Constitution. Nordic Journal of International Law, 78, pp.95–132.]Search in Google Scholar
