1. bookVolume 77 (2016): Issue 4 (December 2016)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
20 Jul 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

Why do foresters oppose the enlargement of the Białowieża National Park? The motivation of the State Forests Holding employees as perceived by social actors engaged in the conflict over the Białowieża Forest

Published Online: 17 May 2017
Page range: 358 - 370
Received: 08 Sep 2016
Accepted: 27 Sep 2016
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
20 Jul 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

This study outlines the main motives of foresters opposing the enlargement of the Białowieża National Park to include areas managed by the State Forests Holding. The motives were identified using discourse analysis tools based on the semistructured interviews with 36 people representing various groups of actors engaged in the discussion on the management of the Białowieża Forest. The main motives I found are connected to: (1) a vision of how nature should be and the foresters’ mission; (2) fear of losing employment or getting a worse job; (3) the high esteem of the forester profession in local communities and an inferior vocational status of the national park employees; (4) defending the professional prestige of foresters and the State Forests Holding; (5) competition with national parks over natural areas; (6) forest science; (7) the wish to continue hunting in the Białowieża Forest; (8) bottom-up pressure on the State Forests Holding employees. The major conflict potential in the discourse around the Białowieża Forest is connected with the perception of its unique natural values and methods of protection. As a result, two opposing coalitions have formed: one supporting forestry interests and one encouraging conservation. The discourse of the forestry-supporting coalition is strengthened by an epistemic community of forest scientists. Some arguments presented by the foresters pushing for a continuation of forest management in Białowieża also indicate the involvement of path dependency, which, in combination with large differences between the coalitions, does not allow for optimism regarding the resolution of the conflict.

Keywords

Adamczyk W. 1994. Rezerwat biosfery Puszczy Białowieskiej a jego mieszkańcy - diagnoza współdziałania (studium socjologiczne). Warszawa-Białystok-Lublin, Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa.Search in Google Scholar

Adger N.W., Brown K., Fairbrass J., Jordan A., Paavola J., Rosendo S., Seyfang G. 2003. Governance for sustainability: towards a ‘thick’ analysis of environmental decision making. Environment and Planning A 35: 1095-1110. DOI 10.1068/a35289.Search in Google Scholar

Blavascunas E. 2014. When foresters reterritorialize the periphery: post-socialist forest politics in Białowieża, Poland. Journal of Political Ecology 21: 475-492.Search in Google Scholar

Blicharska M., Angelstam P. 2010. Conservation at risk: Conflict analysis in the Białowieża Forest, a European biodiversity hotspot. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 6(1-2): 68-74. DOI 10.1080/21513732.2010.520028.Search in Google Scholar

Blicharska M., Van Herzele A. 2015. What a forest? Whose forest? Struggles over concepts and meanings in the debate about the conservation of the Białowieża Forest in Poland. Forest Policy and Economics 57: 22-30. DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.04.003.Search in Google Scholar

Dryzek J.S. 2013. The Politics of the Earth. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Few R. 2002. Researching actor power: Analyzing mechanisms of interaction in negotiations over space. Area 34(1): 29-38. DOI 10.1111/1475-4762.00054.Search in Google Scholar

Franklin S. 2002. Białowieża Forest, Poland: Representation, myth, and the politics of dispossession. Environment and Planning A 34(8): 1459-1485. DOI: 10.1068/a34259.Search in Google Scholar

Gliński P. 2001. Konflikt o puszczę. Raport z badań nad konfliktem społecznym z poszerzeniem BNP . Pogranicze: Studia Społeczne 10: 47-114.Search in Google Scholar

Haas P.M. 1992. Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization 46(1): 1-35. DOI 10.1017/S0020818300001442.Search in Google Scholar

Hajer M. 1995. The politics of environmental discourse. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hajer M., Versteeg W. 2005. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7(3): 175-184. DOI: 10.1080/15239080500339646.Search in Google Scholar

Krasner S.D. 1984. Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics. Comparative Politics 16(2): 223-246. DOI 10.2307/421608.Search in Google Scholar

Niedziałkowski K., Paavola J., Jędrzejewska B. 2012. Participation and Protected Areas Governance: the Impact of Changing Influence of Local Authorities on the Conservation of the Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland. Ecology and Society 17(1). DOI 10.5751/ES-04461-170102.Search in Google Scholar

Niedziałkowski K., Blicharska M., Mikusiński G., Jędrzejewska B. 2014. Why is it difficult to enlarge a protected area? Ecosystem services perspective on the conflict around the extension of the Białowieża National Park in Poland. Land Use Policy 38: 314-329. DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.002.Search in Google Scholar

Pierson P. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review 94(2): 251-267. DOI 10.2307/2586011.Search in Google Scholar

Rancew-Sikora D. 2002. Konflikt w polskim dyskursie ekologicznym: pole analizy konwersacyjnej. Studia Socjologiczne 167(4): 67-84.Search in Google Scholar

Sadowski A. 2001. Społeczno-kulturowe następstwa poszerzenia Białowieskiego Parku Narodowego. Pogranicze: Studia Społeczne 10: 7-46.Search in Google Scholar

Szafer W. 1957. Pierwsze karty z historii Białowieskiego Parku Narodowego. Kosmos 6(5): 469-475.Search in Google Scholar

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo