1. bookVolume 6 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)
Journal Details
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
access type Open Access

If I knew they were the expression of creativity in people with blindness, I would rate them higher - Bias in Evaluating the Work of People with Blindness

Published Online: 09 Apr 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 6 (2019) - Issue 2 (December 2019)
Page range: 182 - 197
Received: 24 Sep 2019
Accepted: 03 Jan 2020
Journal Details
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year

Objective: In our pilot study, we tested to what extent subjective understanding and aesthetic appreciation of em-bossed drawings were dependent on the information that their creators were people with disability. Method: Our research was carried out in a gallery of contemporary art with 30 adults who were non-experts in the field of visual arts. Subjects were asked to view the current exhibition and then evaluate their subjective understanding and aesthetic appreciation (liking and interest) of 12 embossed drawings on seven-point scales. Results: Participants who were aware that persons with blindness had created the drawings (the informed group) in contrast to those who remained unaware (the uninformed group) declared – both – greater subjective understanding and higher appreciation of the exhibited works. In the informed group (N = 15), in comparison to the uninformed group (N = 15), the correlation between appreciation and subjective understanding of artwork was stronger. Conclusions: We discuss our pattern of results considering the attributional approach to creativity (Kasof, 1995) and the model of a cognitive mastering process of aesthetic experiences (Leder, Belke, Oeberst, & Augustin, 2004). Our results can be used, among others, by educators working in art galleries and museums.


Antonak, R. F., & Livneh, H. (1995). Direct and indirect methods to measure attitudes toward persons with disabilities, with an exegesis of the error-choice test method. Rehabilitation Psychology, 40(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.40.1.310.1037/0090-5550.40.1.3Search in Google Scholar

Belke, B., Leder, H., & Augustin, M. D. (2006). Mastering style - Effects of explicit style-related information, art knowledge and affective state on appreciation of abstract paintings. Psychology Science, 48, 115-34.Search in Google Scholar

Bock, R. D. (1975). Multivariate statistical methods in behavioural research. New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Carbon, C.-C. (2017). Art perception in the museum: How we spend time and space in art exhibitions. i-Perception, 8(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/204166951769418410.1177/2041669517694184Search in Google Scholar

Chatterjee, A., Widick, P., Sternschein, R., Smith, W. B., II, & Bromberger, B. (2010). The assessment of art attributes. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28, 207-222. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.28.2.f10.2190/EM.28.2.fSearch in Google Scholar

Cleeremans, A., Ginsburgh, V., Klein, O., & Noury, A. (2016). What’s in a name? The effect of an artist’s name on aesthetic judgments. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 34(1), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/027623741562119710.1177/0276237415621197Search in Google Scholar

Czerwińska, K. (2011). Osoby niewidome według dzieci w wieku wczesnoszkolnym [Blind people according to children in early school age]. Niepełnosprawność i Rehabilitacja, 1(1), 42-54.Search in Google Scholar

D’Angiulli, A., & Maggi, S. (2003). Development of drawing abilities in a distinct population: Depiction of perceptual principles by three children with congenital total blindness. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/0165025024400019110.1080/01650250244000191Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning, Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1086/20935110.1086/209351Search in Google Scholar

Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2015). Titles change the aesthetic appreciations of paintings. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 464. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.0046410.3389/fnhum.2015.00464Search in Google Scholar

Graham, S., & Dwyer, A. (1987). Effects of the learning disability label, quality of writing performance, and examiner’s level of expertise on the evaluation of written products. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 317-318.10.1177/002221948702000513Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, J.-L., Barrett, J. L., & Wlodarski, R. (2014). “I just don’t get it”: Perceived artists’ intentions affect art evaluations. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 32(2), 149-182. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.32.2.c10.2190/EM.32.2.cSearch in Google Scholar

Kasof, J. (1995). Explaining creativity: The attributional perspective. Creativity research journal, 8(4), 311-366. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0804_110.1207/s15326934crj0804_1Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Agars, M. D., & Loomis, D. (2010). Creativity stereotypes and the consensual assessment technique. Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 200-20510.1080/10400419.2010.481529Search in Google Scholar

Kennedy, J. M. (1993). Drawing and the blind: Pictures to touch. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

King, J. L. (1998). The effects of gender bias and errors in essay grading. Educational Research Quarterly, 22, 13-25.Search in Google Scholar

Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 863.10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863Search in Google Scholar

Landy, D., & Sigall, H. (1974). Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer’s physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 299-304. doi: 10.1037/h003601810.1037/h0036018Search in Google Scholar

Lebuda, I., & Karwowski, M. (2013). Tell me your name and I’ll tell you how creative your work is: Author’s name and gender as factors influencing assessment of products’ creativity in four different domains. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 137-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.75229710.1080/10400419.2013.752297Search in Google Scholar

Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489-508. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712604236981110.1348/0007126042369811Search in Google Scholar

Leder, H., Carbon, C.-C., & Ripsas, A.-L. (2006). Entitling art: Influence of title information on subjective understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychologica, 121(2), 176-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.00510.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005Search in Google Scholar

Leder, H., & Nadal, M. (2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode-Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 443-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.1208410.1111/bjop.12084Search in Google Scholar

Lundy, D. E. (2016). Decontaminating taste: Minimizing nonaesthetic biases in aesthetic appraisal. Review of Arts and Humanities, 5, 8-26.10.15640/rah.v5n1a2Search in Google Scholar

Malouff, J. M., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2016). Bias in grading: A meta-analysis of experimental research findings. Australian Journal of Education, 60(3), 245-256.10.1177/0004944116664618Search in Google Scholar

Mastandrea, S., & Crano, W. D. (2019). Peripheral factors affecting the evaluation of artworks. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 37(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/027623741879091610.1177/0276237418790916Search in Google Scholar

Millis, K. (2001). Making meaning brings pleasure: The influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion, 1(3), 320-329. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.32010.1037/1528-3542.1.3.320Search in Google Scholar

Muth, C., & Carbon, C.-C. (2013). The Aesthetic Aha: On the pleasure of having insights into Gestalt. Acta Psychologica 144(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.00110.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.001Search in Google Scholar

Muth, C., Ebert, S., Marković, S., & Carbon, C.-C. (2019). “Aha”ptics: Enjoying an Aesthetic Aha During Haptic Exploration. Perception, 48(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/030100661881801410.1177/0301006618818014Search in Google Scholar

Muth, C., Pepperell, R., & Carbon, C.-C. (2013). Give me Gestalt! Preference for cubist artworks revealing high detectability of objects. Leonardo, 46(5), 488-489. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_0064910.1162/LEON_a_00649Search in Google Scholar

Muth, C., Raab, M. H., & Carbon, C.-C. (2015). The stream of experience when watching artistic movies. Dynamic aesthetic effects revealed by the Continuous Evaluation Procedure (CEP). Frontiers in Psychology, 6:365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.0036510.3389/fpsyg.2015.00365Search in Google Scholar

Muth, C., Raab, M. H., & Carbon, C.-C. (2016). Semantic stability is more pleasurable in unstable episodic contexts. On the relevance of perceptual challenge in art appreciation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10,43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.0004310.3389/fnhum.2016.00043Search in Google Scholar

Niestorowicz, E. (2017). The world in the mind and sculpture of deafblind people. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. London: Mcmillan Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20895-110.1007/978-1-349-20895-1Search in Google Scholar

Ostrowska, A. (1994). Niepełnosprawni w społeczeństwie. Postawy społeczeństwa polskiego wobec ludzi niepełnosprawnych [Disabled in society. Attitudes of Polish society towards people with disabilities]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Filozofii i Socjologii PAN.Search in Google Scholar

Palak, Z. (2000). Uczniowie niewidomi i słabowidzący w szkołach ogólnodostępnych [Blind and visually impaired students in public schools]. Lublin: UMCS Publishing House.Search in Google Scholar

Pelowski, M., Gerger, G., Chetouani, Y., Markey, P. S., & Leder, H. (2017). But is it really art? The classification of laboratory-presented images as “art”/ “not art” and correlations with appraisal and viewer interpersonal differences. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1729. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.0172910.3389/fpsyg.2017.01729Search in Google Scholar

Rochefort-Maranda, G. (2017, December 21). Inflated Effect Sizes and Underpowered Tests: How the Severity Measure of Evidence is Affected by the Winner’s Curse. Retrieved from http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/14237/1/inflated_sev.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Russell, P. A. (2003). Effort after meaning and the hedonic value of paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 94 (Pt 1), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1348/00071260376284213810.1348/000712603762842138Search in Google Scholar

Russell, P. A., & Milne, S. (1997). Meaningfulness and the hedonic value of paintings: Effects of titles. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 15(1), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.2190/EHT3-HWVM-52CB-8QHJ10.2190/EHT3-HWVM-52CB-8QHJSearch in Google Scholar

Sękowski, A. E. (1994). Psychospołeczne determinanty postaw wobec inwalidów [Psychosocial determinants of attitudes towards invalids]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, L. F., Bousquet, S. G., Chang, G., & Smith, J. K. (2006). Effects of time and information on perception of art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 24(2), 229-242. https://doi.org/10.2190/DJM0-QBDW-03V7-BLRM10.2190/DJM0-QBDW-03V7-BLRMSearch in Google Scholar

Smith, R. K., & Newman, G. E. (2014). When multiple creators are worse than one: The bias toward single authors in the evaluation of art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 303-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a003692810.1037/a0036928Search in Google Scholar

Specht, S. M. (2010). Artists’ statements can influence perceptions of artwork. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.28.2.e10.2190/EM.28.2.eSearch in Google Scholar

Swami, V. (2013). Context matters: Investigating the impact of contextual information on aesthetic appreciation of paintings by Max Ernst and Pablo Picasso. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 285-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a003096510.1037/a0030965Search in Google Scholar

Symeonidou, S., & Loizou, E. (2018). Disability studies as a framework to design disability awareness programs: no need for ‘magic’ to facilitate children’s subjective understanding. Disability & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.148867710.1080/09687599.2018.1488677Search in Google Scholar

Szubielska, M. (2018a). People with sight impairment in the world of visual arts: does it make any sense? Disability & Society, 33(9), 1533-1538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.148026110.1080/09687599.2018.1480261Search in Google Scholar

Szubielska, M. (2018b). Wpływ zajęć edukacyjnych prowadzonych w galerii na odbiór abstrakcyjnej sztuki współczesnej przez uczniów młodszych klas szkoły podstawowej [The influence of educational workshops held in a gallery on the reception of abstract contemporary art by primary education students]. Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych [Educational Studies Review], 26(1), 21-44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/PBE.2018.00210.12775/PBE.2018.002Search in Google Scholar

Szubielska, M., Bałaj, B., & Fudali-Czyż, A. (2012). Estetyczny odbiór fotografii poprzez stereotyp umysłowej niepełnosprawności twórcy [Aesthetic evaluation of photographs through the stereotype of author with intellectual disability]. Psychologia Społeczna, 7, 372-378.Search in Google Scholar

Szubielska, M., Imbir, K., & Szymańska, A. (2019). The influence of the physical context and knowledge about artworks on the aesthetic experience of interactive installations. Manuscript under review.Search in Google Scholar

Szubielska, M., Niestorowicz, E., Marek, B. (2016). Drawing without eyesight. Evidence from congenitally blind learners. Annals of Psychology, 19, 681-700. https://doi.org/10.18290/rpsych.2016.19.4-2en10.18290/rpsych.2016.19.4-2enSearch in Google Scholar

Szubielska, M., Pasternak, K., Wójtowicz, M., Szymańska, A. (2018). Evaluation of art of visually impaired people by children and adults. Interdyscyplinarne Konteksty Pedagogiki Specjalnej, 22, 161-177.Search in Google Scholar

Szubielska, M., Ratomska, M., Wójtowicz, M., & Szymańska, A. (2018). The effect of educational workshops in an art gallery on children’s evaluation and interpretation of contemporary art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 0276237418790917.Search in Google Scholar

Szubielska, M., Wójtowicz, M., Szymańska, A., Ratomska, M., & Sztorc, A. (2018). Zajęcia edukacyjne towarzyszące wystawie a odbiór sztuki współczesnej przez dzieci przedszkolne i wczesnoszkolne [The impact of educational classes accompanying the exhibition on the reception of contemporary art by pre-school and early-school children]. EDUKACJA Quarterly, 145(2).Search in Google Scholar

Szuman, W. (1967). O dostępności rysunku dla dzieci niewidomych [On drawing availability for blind children]. Warsaw: Państwowe Zakłady Wydawnictw Szkolnych.Search in Google Scholar

Tschacher, W., Kirchberg, V., van den Berg, K., Greenwood, S., Wintzerith, S., & Tröndle, M. (2012). Physiological correlates of aesthetic perception of artworks in a museum. Psychology of Aesthctics, Crcativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 96-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a002384510.1037/a0023845Search in Google Scholar

Vinter, A., Bonin, P., & Morgan, P. (2018). The severity of the visual impairment and practice matter for drawing ability in children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 78, 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.04.02710.1016/j.ridd.2018.04.027Search in Google Scholar

Wolińska, J. (2015). Percepcja społeczna, stereotyp niepełnosprawności - perspektywa aktora i obserwatora [Social perception, the stereotype of disability - actor-observer perspective]. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio J, Paedagogia-Psychologia, 28(1), 45-66.10.17951/j.2015.28.1.45Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo